以下文字与答案无关
提示:有些试题内容 显示不完整,文字错误 或者 答案显示错误等问题,这是由于我们在扫描录入过程中 机器识别错误导致,人工逐条矫正总有遗漏,所以恳请 广大网友理解。
No, because he was only communicating his views and had not commenced any overt action against the neighbors.
B:Yes, because he was engaged in trespass when he painted the words on his neighbors' house.
C:Yes, because his communication was a threat by which he intended to intimidate his neighbors.
D:Yes, because his communication was racially motivated and thus violated the protections of the Thirteenth Amendment.
">12.A man intensely disliked his neighbors. One night, intending to frighten them, he spraypainted their house with racial epithets and threats to kill them. The man was arrested and prosecuted under a state law providing that "any person who threatens violence against another person with the intent to cause that person to fear for his or her life or safety may be imprisoned for up to five years." In defense, the man claimed that he did not intend to kill his neighbors, but only to scare them so that they would move away.Can the man constitutionally be convicted under this law?
选项: A:No, because he was only communicating his views and had not commenced any overt action against the neighbors.
B:Yes, because he was engaged in trespass when he painted the words on his neighbors' house.
C:Yes, because his communication was a threat by which he intended to intimidate his neighbors.
D:Yes, because his communication was racially motivated and thus violated the protections of the Thirteenth Amendment.