A man is arrested for the murder of his wife and is interviewed under caution with his solicitor present. As insufficient disclosure has been provided, the solicitor states at the beginning of the interview that her client will answer 'no comment' to all questions. The police continue to ask the man a series of detailed questions, repeating the same questions several times and suggest that he is only failing to answer the questions because he is guilty. The man has scratches on his face and the police ask him if his wife scratched him in self-defence when he was killing her.What should the solicitor do in response to the police questions?
选项：

A:The solicitor should ask the man if he would like further legal advice. She should advise him that he should account for the scratches on his face, otherwise an adverse inference may be drawn, but that he should continue to answer 'no comment' to the other police questions.
B:The solicitor should allow the questions to continue provided the man continues to answer 'No comment' to all questions.
C:The solicitor should challenge the police use of repeated and leading questions before allowing the interview to continue.
D:The solicitor should challenge the police use of repeated questions and should ask the man if he would like further legal advice. She should advise him that no adverse inference can be drawn from his failure to account for the scratches and that he should continue to answer 'no comment' to all questions.
E:The solicitor should ask the man if he would like further legal advice. She should advise him that although an adverse inference could be drawn from his silence and his failure to account for the scratches, he should continue to answer 'no comment' to all questions.