以下文字与答案无关
提示:有些试题内容 显示不完整,文字错误 或者 答案显示错误等问题,这是由于我们在扫描录入过程中 机器识别错误导致,人工逐条矫正总有遗漏,所以恳请 广大网友理解。
A student organization received student-activity fee funds to hold a float parade. The organization rejected a student's float submission because the views espoused by the float were contrary to the organization's and parade's message. The student appealed the organization's decision to the university, but the university upheld the rejection of his submission.
The student has filed an action against the university, arguing that the university's decision to uphold the organization's rejection of the student's submission and the university's mandatory student-activity fee violate the First Amendment.
Are the university's actions constitutional?
选项: A:The decision to uphold the organization's rejection of the student's submission and the mandatory student-activity fee are constitutional.
B:The decision to uphold the organization's rejection of the student's submission and the mandatory student-activity fee are unconstitutional.
C:The decision to uphold the organization's rejection of the student's submission is constitutional but the mandatory student-activity fee is unconstitutional.
D:The decision to uphold the organization's rejection of the student's submission is unconstitutional but the mandatory student-activity fee is constitutional.